Above-Ground Pool
Positives
When considering pool types, above-ground pools are by far the cheapest option when it comes to installation. Another advantage that above-ground pools have is that no excavation is required, meaning that what lies beneath the surface (think pipes, cables, rock) isn’t an issue. Excavation is often what makes a pool installation costly, so building above ground negates the need to dig.
Negatives
When choosing various pool types, many consider above-ground pools unsightly even when surrounded by decking. There is not really a way to fully ‘immerse’ the pool into the surrounding landscapes. Moreover, the metal framing of an above-ground pool generally only lasts 7-12 years, meaning that it can be a costlier option in the long term. Finally, the combination of the appearance and the short lifespan can mean an above-ground pool is a deterrent when trying to sell the property.
In-Ground Vinyl-Liner Pool
Positives
A vinyl-liner pool is the cheapest option when it comes to an in-ground pool and can be quite versatile in that any shape or size can be accommodated for. The make-up of the vinyl is soft to the touch and doesn’t foster the growth of algae, meaning costs on chemicals and filters are slightly less.
Negatives
The long-term costs are far higher as the vinyl liner will need to be replaced every 7-15 years, which can cost up to £4,000 (approximately $4,000 USD, adjusted for UK context) to do so. For this reason, you can also expect a liner pool to affect the resale value of the home negatively. Also, although the liner doesn’t foster algae, it can be quite thin and prone to tearing, which can necessitate replacing the entire liner.
In-Ground Fibreglass Pool
Positives
Fibreglass pools generally require the lowest maintenance and lifetime costs in comparison to their counterparts. The make-up of the surface inhibits the growth of algae, meaning less money is spent on chemicals. No money needs to be invested in resurfacing or replacing the liner. Once you have the shell, it should withstand a lifetime of use. Moreover, a fibreglass pool requires minimal time to install.
Negatives
There are limitations when it comes to fibreglass pools in terms of shape, size, and design. They are built from moulds that are extremely expensive to create, so each manufacturer has a finite number of shapes, designs, and sizes available. Moreover, because the shell is fabricated in a factory as opposed to constructed on site, there is a limit to their size based on what can be transported by truck. This is usually no wider than about 4 or 5 metres.
In-Ground Concrete Pool
Positives
In-ground concrete pools provide the most design freedom. Given the space on site, they can be as wide and long as you want, and be constructed to any shape or depth. As well as this, there are more options when it comes to design features such as vanishing edges, beach entries, tanning ledges, and so on. In fact, a concrete pool can become a major design feature and an integrated part of the house, adding significant value.
Negatives
Concrete pools are expensive to maintain. They will require re-tiling/resurfacing every 10-20 years, which can cost between £8,000 and £15,000 (approximately $8,000 and $15,000 USD, adjusted for UK context). In addition, the porous surface nature of concrete creates the perfect environment for algae growth, therefore more chemicals and filtration are required to keep the pool in good condition.
Looking for pool inspiration? Browse modern & contemporary, classic & traditional, or natural & organic pool designs to find the swimming pool that’s right for you.